wonderful. >> after that interview, larry hagman gave me a j.r. style hat of my own. i look at it and remember j.r.'s mantra, don't forgive, never forget and do unto others before they do unto you. they don't make baddies like j.r. any more, they don't make many actors like larry hagman any more, he will be missed. it's 10:00 p.m. on the east coast. we begin keeping them honest, not taking sides, just seeking the truth. talks to diffuse the year end budget bomb. and the difference between washington progress and real progress. americans say they want real progress and real give and take to get there. 72% in our new cnn poll say they want president obama to compromise with republicans on taxes and spending. and an identical 72% want republicans to do the same, compromise with the other side. as for what compromise should

entile, 67%, more than 2 in 3 favor a mix of spending cuts and tax increases. that's what they say real progress would look like. keeping them honest, though, real progress is one thing, washington progress is another. so far at least, we're seeing much more of the second and the first and we're getting late new word that any progress might be stalled. more on that shortly. first, a good example of washington progress. republican lawmakers standing up in a limited way to a beltway power broker named grover norquist over the 1980s era pledge he pressures to sign. promising not to raise taxes, any taxes, ever. >> i'm not obligated on the pledge, i made tennessee ans aware i am honoring the oath when i'm sworn in this january. >> that's one of the handful of republican lawmakers repudiating

the pledge. he joins us shortly. i'll ask him to be more specific about whether that means higher tax rates for high incomes are on the table. something president obama campaigned and won re-election on. senator lindsey graham also breaking with norquist says no on higher tax rates, but is open to more tax revenue by limiting deductions. >> i will violate the pledge long story short for the good of the country only if democrats will do entitlement reform. >> another lawmaker who's breaking with the norquist agrees. >> i think everything should be on the table. i myself am opposed to tax increases, i'm not going to prejudge it, we should not be taking iron clad positions. >> late today in the situation room, republican kevin mccarthy, the house majority whip put a fresh spin on what seems to be the talking points. >> if the goal is to raise more revenue, what is the best way to do that? at the same time protecting the economy? if you're able to gain more

revenue by closing special loopholes, and limiting them. and keeping the rate down, so you have better ground control. isn't that a better outcome. >> talk of tax deductions and closing loopholes. a big note on raising tax rates. a lot of talk, but not much real movement, at least for now. as for grover norquist. he told soledad o'brien today, although some republicans are discussing impure thoughts on television, they won't really act on them. >> lindsay graham says i would raise taxes if, and then he lists this incredible list of reforms and entitlements that the democrats would never give him. as i suggested to him, i said, senator you're offering to trade a tax increase for a pink unicorn that doesn't exist. >> whether he does or doesn't bend on taxes, pundits here in washington seem terribly impressed that senator graham and others are talking about

going against grover norquist. outside the beltway, most people don't know grover norquist from grover on sesame street. standing up to a lobbyist, even a powerful one is only washington progress, not real progress. first step, maybe even a necessary one. but only that, so is going on sunday talk shows as both republicans and democrats are doing. and talking about flexibility. >> let the rates go up to 39. let us also take a look at the deductions. let's make sure that revenue is an integral part of deficit deduction. and from my side of the table. bring entitlement reform into the conversation. >> so far, senator durbin has limited company among some fellow democrats. keeping them honest during the last budget showdown, both sides talked like this, but then they backed away. also as we mentioned a moment ago, there are late new signs that nobody's quite ready to cut a deal. another round of white house talks between congressional

leaders and president obama was promised but is yet to materialize. a senate democratic leadership aid telling us that staff level meetings meant to lay the groundwork haven't been productive. one senate republican leadership aid accuses democrats of leaking details in order to portray republicans negatively. the talks are continuing, which itself can be read as some sort of progress. whether that's real progress or washington progress, remains to be seen. a lot to talk about starting with tennessee republican senator bob corker. thanks very much for joining us. let's talk about grover norquist. no new taxes pledged. you said earlier in your career, you told cbs morning news earlier today, and i'm quoting now, you said you're not obligated on the pledge, adding the only thing i'm honoring is the oath that i take when i'm sworn in this january. so what exactly did you mean by that? did you suggest -- did you mean

that under certain circumstances you would be ready to accept an increase in tax rates for the wealthy? >> well, i was just elected as you know, re-elected. and our campaign materials during the campaign spelled out that the only pledge i would be honoring would be the pledge of the oath of office that you make when you're sworn in. that's what my comments meant. i think republicans had shown a willingness to look at revenues as long as we have entitlement reform. i think those are the two ends of the spectrum. and it appears to me that speaker boehner has been shown flexibility in revenues and it appears to me the president has shown flexibility on entitlements. and the point of my op ed this morning was look, it's so much easier for us to go ahead and make these decisions and put them behind us and start the new year with economic growth having dealt with these issues than it is to negotiate some progress, where we kick the can down the road and deal with this six

months from now with a more limited menu and more draconian steps, because we've dug a deeper hole. >> you're talking about capping deductions let's say at 30,000 or $50,000 per household, but what if the democrats insist and say they're not going to sinai deal unless there's at least some increase in the marginal rate for the wealthy. people making $250,000 a year. right now they're paying 35%. it was 39.6% as you remember, during the clinton administration. what if they insist it's got to go up to 37%. is that acceptable under any circumstances? >> i think the two most important people in these negations, you would agree, are speaker boehner and the president. that's a negotiation that needed to have -- obviously speaker boehner for a bill to pass, it has to pass the house. what i've attempted to do is show that there's a way of getting revenues that we need to

solve this problem. as long as it is accompanied when the entitlement reforms. there's a way of doing that without increasing rates, if people want to draw a line in the sand and say, it has to be my way or the highway, that might be problematic. i've tried to lay out a bill as the op ed in the washington post that deals with the issues, deals with the revenues that democrats want to see. and candidly i think all of us know have to be there to truly deal with this issue. does it in a way that's progrowth. >> under any proposals you're making, capping deductions for richer families, richer americans, would that be a violation of the grover norquist no new taxes pledge? >> i think a lot of people made the pledge 20 years ago, 25 years ago, 25 years ago, 15 years ago. we're in a very critical time for our country. and this issue has to be dealt with.

revenues need to be a part of the component and entitlement reform, true entitlement reform has to be there also. in order for us to put this in the rearview mirror. >> major tax reform is certainly not going to happen before the new year. there could be an agreement in two steps, a down payment coming right now including revenue for closing loopholes, spending cuts. the major tax reform put off until next year. what do you think about that? >> well, we know what the options are. this congress, the 112th congress has been through two dry runs already. no congress is more aware of what the options are. and certainly we can deal with some kind of tax reform next year. from the standpoint of dealing with this fiscal issue now. it's only a matter of political courage. again, no other congress has spent more time on this. we can make the decisions we

need to make now. i'm telling you, wolf, it's much easier to do that technically and write it down and pass it, than it is to try to negotiate some process that's likely to fail like the first two processes have, we're better off just going ahead and ripping the band aid off, making the decisions we need to make and move down the road. >> thanks for joining us. good luck. >> thank you, sir. see you later. let's bring in the political panel gloria bore gger is joini us, ross doffet and van jones the co foufrntder of rebuild the dream. even a majority of republicans in our latest poll, a majority of republicans said tax increases should be part of the fiscal cliff solution. add that to the election results, and the exit poll results, so how much do all those numbers change the political equation for the gop right now? >> it's hard to say

definitively, wolf. i think it changes the equation a little bit. but i think what's more interesting, what you're hearing from senator corker and the rest is the sort of sell antic question, not arithmetic, but semantics. when is a tax increase not really a tax increase. if you don't raise the top rate, if you were talking to the senator before, but you do cap deductions, for the wealthy, does that count as a tax increase? in my book it does count. would republicans then be able to say, well, we didn't raise the top rate? so i think what we see going on right now is a lot of theatrics, you see some republicans in the senate. and i would argue that the house republicans are the ones we really need to hear from, because they're the most dug in on the tax question. so you hear some republicans kind of saying, you know, that's a pledge that was 20 years ago, et cetera, et cetera. bottom line, wolf. you need to have entitlement

reform and those spending cuts on the table and you need to have tax increases on the table. then they can all hold hands and jump off the cliff together. >> even though the styles that republicans are using to pedal their position right now seems to be shifting the substance of the position. seems to be pretty much the same as it's been for a long time. maybe you disagree? >> i actually disagree, i think this is a pretty big shift. gloria's right, it's been more of a shift from the senate than from the house, but for a long time. you had republicans willing to say, look, we'll accept more revenue as long as it's revenue that comes from growth. you project that economic growth gives you x amount more tax revenue and so on. that's not what they're saying. now they're willing to say, look, we'll sort of set the economic growth component aside, just do static scoring, look at the amount of revenue you get, and accept that, it is a big shift. i think it is -- corker's pretty

upfront about this, it is insane, i didn't take the pledge, and so on. it would violate the letter of the norquist pledge. it is a big concession. the question is, is it a big enough concession given the stronger hand that the president has right now, i think what you're seeing right now would have been the makings of a deal a year and a half ago. but the question for the white house is, you got republicans -- they have conceded this much, what else will they concede. and are you -- is it a situation where the white house' goal is saying, this is a once in a -- you know, once in a cycle, once in a generation opportunity to get republicans to raise taxes. let's see how much revenue we can extract. >> and you know that in exchange for the republicans biting the bullet, they want democrats to do the same thing when it comes to entitlement spending. they want cuts, serious cuts in medicare, medicaid. will the liberal base go along with the president if he puts

that into the deal? >> probably not. and part of the reason is because the democrats are in such a much more commanding position. you're taing about medicare, medicaid, social security. these are programs that are popular and working. if you look at social security, this program is solvent until 2038. you have a hard time convincing ordinary people there's some big emergency there. you have a hard time getting ordinary people to understand why we should take a chainsaw to middle class programs that are working, that are popular. to get republicans -- >> what will the democrats do to bring in the republicans to convince the republicans they're really going to cut spending? >> i think the spending cuts are on the table now with regard to defense. which i think is appropriate. >> 75% of americans say defense should be cut. you're not going to get a 50/50

compromise here. you get a 50/50 compromise when both sides are equal distance from the american people. the democrats are right there, you have super majorities that say, hands off medicare, hands off social security. defense spending should be cut. i think the democrats are -- there's less pressure on democrats to give away the store here. >> didn't the president, when he tried that deal with john boehner, he didn't he agree to significant cuts in medicare? >> yeah, he did. they were almost there once before. and there are different stories about who moves a goal post in that negotiation, but i would argue. if i were the president and i were going to van, i would say, look, this president has an opportunity right now to shape the future of american budgets, the blueprint for the american economy, and for american spending priorities for a decade to come. in this particular deal.

and so if i were the president, i would say, look, it's not going to be perfect, but we really do have an opportunity here, and i have an opportunity as president of the united states to lead this country into fiscal solvency again. if each side -- we can't get what's perfect. >> but let me speak up for van. >> hold on a second, i want ross to wrap it up. >> well, i was going to say, i think i disagree completely with van on the policy, i think over the long run, if you look at the growth rate in medicare and the fact that every year you don't change social security, it gets more expensive to fix. there are deep policy reasons why entitlements shoulding on the table. on the politics he makes a strong case. i think he can -- the liberal base can go back to the president and say, why wouldn't you want -- yes, you have an opportunity to shape the future of american fiscal policy, why wouldn't you want to extract every last concession you could get? i thinked fact that the van

jones wing of the democratic party has political sense on their side is what makes it hard -- you know, hard to cut a deal along the lines we're seeing right now. >> everyone's going to lose at least in the short term if there's no deal. taxes are going to go for the wealthy, the middle class, everyone in the country will be paying more taxes and there will be very serious domestic spending cuts and defense cuts if there is no deal. van jones, gloria borger, guys, thanks very much. let us know what you think, follow us on twitter @ac 360. millions celebrated the demise of a dictator, now they're on the streets accusing his successor of trying to become one too. things are moving fast in egypt. we'll take threw live. ♪

why not make lunch more than just lunch?

with two times the points on dining in restaurants, you may find yourself asking why not, a lot. chase sapphire preferred. there's more to enjoy. if you're a man with low testosterone, you should know that axiron is here. the only underarm treatment for low t. that's right, the one you apply to the underarm. axiron is not for use in women or anyone younger than 18. axiron can transfer to others through direct contact. women, especially those who are or who may become pregnant, and children should avoid contact where axiron is applied as unexpected signs of puberty in children or changes in body hair or increased acne in women may occur. report these signs and symptoms to your doctor if they occur. tell your doctor about all medical conditions and medications. do not use if you have prostate or breast cancer. serious side effects could include increased risk of prostate cancer;

worsening prostate symptoms; decreased sperm count; ankle, feet, or body swelling; enlarged or painful breasts; problems breathing while sleeping; and blood clots in the legs. common side effects include skin redness or irritation where applied, increased red blood cell count, headache, diarrhea, vomiting, and increase in psa. see your doctor, and for a 30-day free trial, go to axiron.com. do you really think brushing is enough to keep it clean? while brushing misses germs in 75% of your mouth, listerine® cleans virtually your entire mouth. so take your oral health to a whole new level. listerine®... power to your mouth™. he was the man of the hour. egypt's first democratically elected leader. now he's being calls a would-be

dictator, people are protesting, some are getting killed. massive crowds at the funeral of a protester who died overnight. fatally injured against morsi's edict. putting his decisions beyond judicial review. ever since he issued it. the streets have looked like this, just like they did when millions rose to overthrow the dictator. this time, the protesters are accusing president morsi of a make ed power grab. today he met with members of the highest judicial body. emerged saying his edict had been clarified. what that clarification really amounts to remains unclear. resa joins us now with the latest. this is this a clarification or is this morsi faced with the protests we've been seeing, trying to save face while scaling back his decree?

>> well, wolf, we've spoken to the president's office throughout the day, they say their condition is clear, they're not scaling back on any of these decrees. they seem to be reshaping and refocusing their message. mr. morsi's message now is, with these decrees, i didn't amass sweeping dick ta toriaial powers and my decisions are still open to review by the courts, except for the decision that has to do with the formation of the parliament and the drafting of the constitution. he says this is his way of bypassing the old remnants of the mubarak regime that wanted to derail the democratic process, he wants to save it, that message doesn't seem to be winning over the protesters, a few thousand of them behind me. it's 3:15 a.m., their numbers seem to be growing in anticipation of the 1 million man demonstration scheduled for tuesday.

>> they're under calls to decrease the decrees. are there any signs he's considering doing that? >> the way things stand right now, they are not we spoke to a top adviser, we asked him about the possibility of concessions in mounting pressure and here's what he had to say. what kind of concessions are you -- >> translator: it's up to the president, not for us. >> is it possible -- are you prepared to consider rescinding adjusting some of these decrees? >> decree is up to the president. we may have some reservations, but as a whole, we must take a step to forward not backward.

>> that's where the impasse is, mr. morsi and his followers are saying, ween watt to talk. the opposition factor saying no talk until these decrees are rescinded. >> reza, is the president's party supposedly backing down? >> i think the only time the opposition is going to view mr. morsi and his followers is backing down is if he rescinds these decrees and that hasn't happened yet. what we also had happen on monday is the 1 million man demonstration for the muslim brotherhood. that was cancelled suddenly on monday night. they released a statement, they wanted to make sure that no one viewed this as a weakness. they essentially said they cancelled it because they were concerned about possible violence, of course. the stage was set for an explosive situation with a 1 million man demonstration to the opposition and the muslim brotherhood. now a lot of people breathing a sigh of relief that's not going to happen. >> reza, thank you.

let's dig deeper right now, robin wright senior fellow at the woodrow wilson center in washington. robin, you don't think that president morsi was trying to create a dictator ship overnight, do you think he did go too far? what do you think he was trying to accomplish? >> he did go too far. and the timing was terrible. but the context is really important. egypt's judiciary had earlier this year had dissolved a democratically elected parliament. and there were deep fears the judiciary was moving in the next couple weeks to resolve an assembly that was working on a new constitution. the process could take a year, year and a half. this is time that egypt doesn't have. there's a real interest in moving forward and creating solutions to the many problems

that have been left behind by the mubarak era. the problem throughout the region where you see changes is this deep polarization between islamist parties and secular forces and both sides being deeply afraid that the other side is going to create -- whether it's an islamic regime or take countries back into autocratic rule. >> steven, you say president morsi and the muslim brotherhood after spending decades being sidelined by the mubarak regime, they're terrified of losing power. beyond that, is there much clarity about their motives in recent days? >> there doesn't seem to be. the muslim brotherhood is motivated, it's been decades out of power, and months in power. this seems to have been a misstep, a misjudgment. the question is, what were the motivations behind it? was it as some have suggested

morsi was feeling confident riding a wave of international approval after brokering a cease-fire in the gaza operation last week? did he think that this was the time to capitalize on it, or what -- was it just simply the fact that they fear that the old regime, the old guard might try to move against them through the courts. i think it's going to become clear, certainly as many skeptics doubting his actions. it looks like we're going to be seeing that back on the streets. >> robin, you make the point that there's being a fog of transition if you will -- a crucial point i imagine. washington is concerned egypt has been a key ally in the region. is this just growing pains of a new democracy. or is something darker and more nefarious going on? >> that will play out over the next few weeks or months. president morsi was eight months

ago an unknown engineering professor who has been elevated quickly to what may arguably be the most important or powerful leadership in the entire arab world. he's surprised many people, on some of his decisions in working with the israelis. during the gaza war he did not call for jihad. he was a responsible broker in trying to come to a cease-fire. interestingly enough, today was the day that talks began in trying to take this fragile cease-fire into something that was more enduring. that will be a very important judge of the caliber of the man, his intentions long term and the role he'll play in the region. >> you know, it's funny, because when i was in israel, steven, last week and met with israeli officials, they were praising president morsi, they were pretty impressed by what he was doing, and trying to deliver a cease-fire between hamas and israel. what do you think about the role that he played? will the cease-fire last? >> that, nobody knows, i

certainly don't think any questions have been resolved in the long run in gaza. both sides have held off. both sides certainly to their supporters are claiming that they did what had to be done, but they both reserve the right to carry on doing it in the future. i think it's very, very unclear what's going to be happening in gaza. other than, i think long lasting harmony is extremely long lasting. >> is the cease-fire going to last? >> i think there's greater potential for movement on the peace process than any time in recent history, because there's so many arab governments in the region, including particularly in egypt, that really want to focus on the broader domestic issues, whether it's 40% unemployment among young people. creating the kind of solutions that led to these issues, to the issues that led to the uprising in the first place. there's enormous pressure to look domestically, there's less interest in promoting or

energizing the conflict than any time that i can remember, and i've been covering these conflicts since 1973. >> all right. robin wright, thanks very much. steven ferrell, thanks to you as well. a lot more happening tonight, including new and horrifying images coming out of syria, video showing the aftermath of an air strike that purportedly hit a playground full of children. it comes as the asads regime launches a new wave of attacks across the country. we'll have an update from a photojournalist who just spent eight days inside syria straight ahead. as is already saving us money, producing cleaner electricity, putting us to work here in america and supporting wind and solar. though all energy development comes with some risk, we're committed to safely and responsibly producing natural gas. it's not a dream. america's natural gas... putting us in control of our energy future, now.

with scottrader streaming quotes, any way you want. fully customize it for your trading process -- from thought to trade, on every screen. and all in real time. which makes it just like having your own trading floor, right at your fingertips. [ rodger ] at scottrade, seven dollar trades are just the start. try our easy-to-use scottrader streaming quotes. it's another reason more investors are saying... [ all ] i'm with scottrade. but i still have a runny nose. [ male announcer ] dayquil doesn't treat that. huh? [ male announcer ] alka-seltzer plus rushes relief to all your worst cold symptoms, plus it relieves your runny nose. [ sighs ] thank you! [ male announcer ] you're welcome. that's the cold truth! well, having a ton of locations doesn't hurt. and a santa to boot! [ chuckles ] right, baby. oh, sir. that is a customer. oh...sorry about that. [ male announcer ] break from the holiday stress. fedex office.

[ male announcer ] break from the holiday stress. alriwoah! did you get that? and...flip! yep, look at this. it takes like 20 pictures at a time. i never miss anything. isn't that awesome? uh that's really cool. you should upload these. i know, right? that is really amazing. the pictures are so clear. kevin's a handsome devil that phone does everything! search dog tricks. okay, see if we can teach him something cool. look at how lazy kevin is. kevin, get it together dude cmon, kevin take 20 pictures with burst shot on the galaxy s3. susan rice is about to face her toughest critics on the benghazi attacks.

just ahead, which lawmakers she'll be meeting with. with its foot-activated lift gate. but that's not all you'll see, cause c-max also beats prius v, with better mpg. say hi to the all-new 47 combined mpg c-max hybrid.

a horrifying scene in syria. reports of a massacre on a playground outside is a mass cass. we have to warn you, the images are extremely graphic, and

things in syria remain ugly. opposition members who posted this video say it was made after government planes dropped cluster bombs on a playground sunday. ten children reportedly died. they believe the attack was retaliation for the recent victory taking control of a nearby airport. cnn cannot verify the video or those claims. human rights groups estimate 140 people died today alone in syria. about 40,000 civilians have been killed since this all began. the violence now spilling over into neighboring countries as well. turkey, once an ally has turned against syria, following several deaths blamed on syrian forces. that's where freelance photo journalist robert king is tonight after spending last week inside syria and more than eight months covering the conflict. robert, you just left syria today. you say that this time of bloodshed is happening every day. that syria has become a place

where people are constantly burying their children. describe what you saw. >> well, wolf, on this time inside aleppo i was witnessing the hospital being attacked by a syrian jet fighter. it destroyed the hospital completely. doctors and nurses and assistants scrambling to dig out the wounded, dig out the dead. that was just last week. and prior to that i've seen fathers unconsolable holding their dead children, waiting for taxis. children that had their heads almost cut off from rocket attacks. i've seen hungry, hungry people. now the weather is changing and it's getting colder, and so i've seen -- the last eight months i've been covering this region, i've seen just systemic bombings and indiscriminate killing of

innocent civilians. >> is it your sense that the regime, the syrian regime was targeting the hospital, or was it just indiscriminate bombing that accidentally hit the hospital? >> well, i personally believe that it was directly targeted. the hospital had taken three to four direct hits in the last few months, and there had been a consistent pattern of bombings just around the hospital. whether it was one block to the right or one block to the left. this bomb actually was dropped precisely on a part of the hospital. the building that was hit was where the medical administrative staff was located, and also where they would sanitize and sterilize their instruments used in operations. after that bomb hit, their emergency room was completely caved in. whoever was in there died.

i think there were a few people that actually survived and were -- they broke a hole through the back wall of the hospital to help pull these people out. >> robert, the conflict in syria as you well know has been going on now for more than a year ago and a half. did the people you talk to while you were there, still have faith that president bashar al assad's days are numbered? >> yes, i would say so. a lot of the -- the majority of the people i speak with truly believe that assad will lose aleppo in the coming months. i think they really understand that in order to take damascus and to overthrow bashar might take a few more months than a couple. i strongly believe from what

i've heard on the ground that their will to overthrow bashar is as strong as it was two years ago. >> robert king, thanks very much. >> thank you so much, wolf. we're following other stories tonight. isha sesay joining us with a 360 bulletin. isha? >> wolf, u.n. ambassador susan rice is preparing to face some of her toughest critics on the benghazi consulate attacks. she's heading to capitol hill this week to discuss the incidents with senators john mccain, lindsey graham and kelly ayotte. rice initially blamed them on protests triggered by a film. the man behind that movie is speaking out about the backlash for the first time. he tells "the new york times" he has no regrets. he's back in prison after violating his probation on a bank fraud conviction. new york city mayor bloomberg is asking congress for $9.8 billion to clean up the mess left behind by hurricane sandy.

bloomberg says the cash is needed to pay for costs not covered by fema and insurance companies. wolf. >> thank you. coming up we told you about a town in california mired in corruption charges that left taxpayers outraged. a town where the former police chief finagled a salary for himself of nearly half a million dollars. you won't believe what he's doing now. he wants more money from the city. we're keeping them honest next. how you doing today? i'm good thanks. how are you? i'm good. [ gordon ] but for others, it's all they can afford. every day nearly nine million older americans don't have enough to eat. anything else? no, not today. join me, aarp, and aarp foundation in the drive to end hunger by visiting drivetoendhunger.org. what starts with adding a friend... ♪

...could end with adding a close friend. the lexus december to remember sales event is on. this is the pursuit of perfection.

a stunning twist in the casey anthony case. what investigators reportedly missed when they searched her computer. could it have changed the outcome of her murder trial? that's just ahead on "360." ♪

♪ [ male announcer ] everyone deserves the gift of all day pain relief. this season, discover aleve. all day pain relief with just two pills.

another keeping them honest report tonight about a working class town in california we've told you about before. a town where charges of corruption and fraud have left taxpayers outraged. the former police chief of belle, california make a

whopping salary, almost half a million dollars a year before a corruption case brought down eight leaders in the city government who now face criminal charges. the former chief wasn't charged in the case, and believe it or not now he says he wants more money from the city and the state. he's suing to double his already large pension. that is adding major insult to injury for the city's taxpayers who ended up footing the bill for a level of alleged corruption in local government that's hard to imagine. >> reporter: a 22-year veteran of the belle police force james cochran is reminded of the corruption that crushed his town at every turn he takes. boarded up buildings and vacant homes and lots, and storefront after storefront for lease, but nowhere is a reminder more stark than his own police station, where he says his former police chief was there for only one reason, greed. >> he was here for his personal gain.

he was not here to better the community. certainly not here to better us. >> he's talking about former police chief randy adams pulling in a whooping $457,000 a year for a police force with only 30 officers, way more than top cops in neighboring los angeles, chicago or even new york. cash put in his pocket by a city manager and others who were paying themselves inflated salaries. the city manager taking home more than a million dollars. >> yeah, you! >> this was the reaction when the public found out. outrage, anger boiled over. prosecutors nabbed eight city leaders saying they used public funds like a personal piggy bank looting the city of millions of dollars. they face criminal corruption charges. chief randy adams wasn't charged because he didn't directly control the city's money. even a judge wondered in court, i don't know why he's not a defendant in this case. so where is adams today?

he lives in simi valley, an upper classical cal city 50 miles northwest of belle, just off of country club drive in a gated community. his five-bedroom, five bath home overlooks a golf course. >> disgusting, and the fact he's living the lavish lifestyles on the backs of us. >> reporter: she calls adams the one who got away. >> arrogant, cocky, criminal. if i can find the dictionary where it is corrupt police chief, whatever, his picture would be on it. he's the epitome of what is wrong in it country. >> she says that because of these e-mails from 2009 exchanged between adams and angela, bell's former assistant city administrator. he negotiated the terms of his new job as police chief wrote, i am looking forward to seeing you and taking all of belle's money. okay, just a share of it. she replies, lol, you can take

your share of the pie just like us. we will all get fat together. the salary quietly approved by the former city manager. >> my jaw drops when you see it. >> doug willmore says he still can't believe what happened and what's still happen iing. talking to me in the rundown city council chambers, he says walking away with that half million dollar paycheck wasn't enough. the former police chief is suing the city of bell for what city sources calculate would amount to $600,000 in severance and unused sick days. >> from this small city and poor community, to them, have it revealed, and get fired and come back for severance, it's incredible. it's outrageous. >> randy adams wants more money from the state of california for his pension. adams is also suing the state to double his pension to half a million dollars a year for the rest of his life. how? his oversized salary in bell.

that was his last job. his highest-paying job, and even though he only held the position a year, he says his pension should be based on that pay. chief randy adams i'm from cnn. we caught up with randy adams in simi valley. the people of the city of bell saw you milked them for he a sal salary that was extraordinarily high and now you're trying to do the same thing with the state. >> well, i disagree, of course, with those types of characterizations. when one day i'm able to tell my complete side of the story, i think you'll see there is a completely different side to that story. unfortunately, i can't talk at length about it, but that's the situation. >> do you think you deserve to make double what the lapd chief made? >> i've made all the comments i can make at this time. >> reporter: adams would not elaborate on camera, i did manage to speak to his attorney by telephone, who says adams is a good cop, a lifelong public servant who does deserve to

double his pension to half a million dollars a year for that one year service in bell. but the people who run california's pension system say absolutely not. what is he asking for? >> basically he's trying to double his pension from $19,000 a month, which is far surpassing almost anyone else in our system as a retiree, to about $38,000 a month. >> does he deserve that from the taxpayers? >> the taxpayers are outraged whenever anyone does something like trying to use fraud and deceit and hide the way in which they got paid. you don't deserve it and it's not allowed. >> a proposed decision agrees rejecting adams' appeal to increase his pension, but adams is appealing. inside his gated community he awaits a final decision. >> do people of bell believe that adams only wanted to take the police chief job for a short time so he could boost his pension? >> they believe it's twofold.

in the short term, wolf, they believe it was the inflated paycheck but in the long term absolutely. it's called spiking your pension. you just take a job to increase what the state will pay you for the rest of your life. duking the system is also what it's referred to. the state pension board also agrees and that's why they're fighting it. >> why did they pick adams for the job in the first place? >> well, it's all who you know, right? wolf, in this situation, the documents appear to show that it's who he was friends with, and that's who got him into the city of bell, and that he was merely just trying to cushion that pension pay. but the people say, hey, we don't want this guy. we didn't think he was anything special, and the state agreeing with that, they believe this is a backroom deal, that's why they're also fighting it. >> what a report, thanks for doing it. we appreciate it very, very much. just ahead, the google searches that reportedly never made it into evidence in casey anthony's murder trial. could they have convinced the

jury they murdered her 2-year-old daughter caylee. professor sargent, can you tell me what cd rates will be in two years? no. if he can't, no one can. that's why ally has a raise your rate cd. ally bank. your money needs an ally. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 you know, the one that's been lying around.

tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 rollover your old 401(k) to a schwab ira, and we'll help you tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 find new ways to make your money work harder. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 so if you're ready to teach your old 401(k) some new tricks... tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 talk to chuck. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 rollover your old 401(k) tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 to a schwab ira tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 and you can receive up to $600. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 see schwab.com tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 for terms and conditions. tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 call, click or visit tdd#: 1-800-345-2550 to open an account today. good boy. constipated? yeah. mm. some laxatives like dulcolax can cause cramps. but phillips' caplets don't. they have magnesium. for effective relief of occasional constipation. thanks. [ phillips' lady ] live the regular life. phillips'. [ male announcer ] can a car be built around a state of mind? ♪ announcing the all-new 2013 malibu from chevrolet. ♪ with a remarkable new interior featuring the available chevrolet mylink infotainment system.

this is where sophisticated styling begins. and where it ends? that's up to you. it's here -- the greatest malibu ever. ♪ when you take a closer look... ...at the best schools in the world... ...you see they all have something very interesting in common. they have teachers... ...with a deeper knowledge of their subjects. as a result, their students achieve at a higher level. let's develop more stars in education. let's invest in our teachers... ...so they can inspire our students. let's solve this. part of a whole new line of tablets from dell.

it's changing the conversation. ♪ i'm isha sesay back with another 360 bulletin. a new twist in the casey anthony case. detectives investigating the disappearance of her daughter, caylee, overlooked more than 1200 entries on a computer in anthony's home including a google search for fool-proof suffocation methods according to reports. anthony was acquitted in caylee's death last year.

chris christie will be running for re-election next year. he's wildly popular in the wake of sandy, he loves the job, and sees no reason to leave it voluntarily. expect a formal announcement next month. it's time for powerball fever once again. no one hit the jackpot in saturday's $325 million drawing. the next drawing is wednesday, worth an estimated 425 million. wolf's back right after this. you know, one job or the other. the moment i could access the retirement plan, i just became firm about it -- you know, it's like it just hits you fast. you know, you start thinking about what's really important here. ♪ of green giant vegetables

it's easy to eat like a giant... ♪ and feel like a green giant. ♪ ho ho ho ♪ green giant